|
The
Issue
Customer's
expectations related to products and services have continued to
increase. As soon as an organization "wows" the customer
with a better product and/or service, it becomes the standard and
the customers begin to look for organizations that perform at a
higher quality level. In WWII acceptable defect levels of 1, 2 or
even 5% was the norm. When we bought a car, we planned on coming
back with a long list of things that needed to be corrected. Then,
the Japanese auto industry showed us that better autos could be
produced in large quantities. They also showed us that televisions,
radios, steel, and many other products could be produced at high
quality levels without increasing cost.
America
reacted with a series of quality improvement initiatives - first,
total quality control, then zero defects, followed by total quality
management, and process reengineering. In the 1990s ISO 9000 systems
became the "in" thing to do and now Six Sigma is the latest
improvement approach. Each time that a customer demanded a significant
degree of improvement in quality, a new methodology was developed,
or, to put it more correctly, another methodology evolved. The standard
for quality today has increased from 2% defective in the 1940s to
00.0003% defective. To meet this high quality requirement, a drastic
change in the processes that we use was necessary. Organizations
can inspect and reject parts, but the defect escape rate runs about
10%. We have often heard, "You can't inspect quality into a
product". Until the Six Sigma methodology was accepted by business,
processes that were capable of producing no more than 62 defects
per 100,000 units was acceptable. Now, a Six Sigma process will
be able to produce no more than 0.034 defects per 10,000 units produced.
This type of performance is now expected not only from production,
but also from internal support departments and service organizations.
The Solution
The
Six Sigma methodology is focused on the use of simple statistical
methods to analyze, measure, and improve the performance of all
the processes throughout the organization. All employees are trained
to understand the Six Sigma principles and to successfully apply
the core strategies to their processes. Upon completing the course,
they are given the title of Green Belt. Selected employees are chosen
to attend an advanced training program. Typically, these training
programs are given one week per month over a four-month period.
Between the classes the students are assigned to use the tools that
they were taught during the class. At the end of the four months,
if they successfully complete the class, they are awarded the title
of Black Belt. They are then turned loose with a mission to seek
out and destroy problems that are plaguing the organization.
The
Harrington Institute teaches classes for Green and Black Belt. In
addition, we serve as Master Black Belts in helping to implement
the Six Sigma methodologies at our clients' sites.
We agree with Frederick R. McFadden that the Six Sigma methodology
is more than just statistical analysis and problem solving; it is
made up of two major elements.
| I.
|
Basic
Concepts |
|
| |
A.
Improvement Process |
|
| |
1. |
Define
products and services |
|
| |
2. |
Identify
customer requirements |
|
| |
3. |
Compare
product with requirements |
|
| |
4. |
Describe
the process |
|
| |
5. |
Improve
the process |
|
| |
6. |
Measure
quality and productivity |
|
| |
B.
Quality Measurements |
|
| |
1. |
Process mean and standard deviation |
|
| |
2. |
Capability
index Cp and Cpk |
|
| |
3. |
Defects
per unit (dpu) |
|
| II. |
Imbedding
Initiatives and Tools |
|
| |
A.
Quality Initiatives |
|
| |
1. |
Participative
management |
|
| |
2. |
Short-cycle
manufacture |
|
| |
3. |
Design
for manufacturing |
|
| |
4. |
Benchmarking |
|
| |
5. |
Statistical
process control |
|
| |
6. |
Supplier
qualification |
|
| |
B.
Improvement Tools |
|
| |
1. |
Quality function deployment |
|
| |
2. |
Flowcharts |
|
| |
3. |
Pareto
charts |
|
| |
4. |
Histograms |
|
| |
5. |
Cause-and-effect
diagrams |
|
| |
6. |
Experimental
design |
|
|